Global Banking Industry Names Regulation & Political Interference as Top Risks over Macro-Economic Concerns
'Banana Skins’ poll identifies top threats to banks
Tuesday, April 29, 2014 - Regulation and political interference topped the list of risks among the global banking industry (No.1 and No.2 respectively) – replacing 2012’s leading threat, the macro-economic environment, according to the Banking Banana Skins 2014 survey released today.
The CSFI’s biennial Banking Banana Skins survey, produced in association with PwC, revealed the overwhelming message from respondents: the weight of new regulation is becoming excessive and could dampen economic recovery and growth. The poll is based on responses from more than 650 bankers, banking regulators and close observers of the banking industry in 59 countries.
Political interference was also specified by respondents as causing more costs and constraints to the banking sector. Some of the strongest concerns around political interference come from Europe – where extensive measures have been proposed or adopted at both the EU and national levels to make banks safer.
However, the survey also shows that anxiety about the outlook for banks has started to decline for the first time in seven years, suggesting that the operating climate for banks is finally turning.
The poll shows that concerns expressed in earlier surveys about capital availability, liquidity, credit quality and exotic products in the banking system have begun to ease. Although confidence about the macro-economic outlook has also strengthened, the survey reveals strong ongoing concern about the stability of the Eurozone, and rising worries about emerging markets, particularly China where the banking system is seen to be under stress. The outlook for the tapering of quantitative easing by central banks is widely seen as crucial to global economic prospects.
A fast-rising risk in the Banana Skins ranking is technology risk, which has risen from No. 18 to No. 4, largely on the back of strengthening concern about cybercrime. This is a problem which, as one respondent said: “can only get bigger” and cost banks heavily both financially and reputationally. Technology concerns also centre on back office systems which are seen to be ageing but also a low priority for investment.
A breakdown of responses shows that all major respondent types (bankers, observers and risk managers) are strongly concerned about regulatory excess and political interference, as well as the state of the global economy. However non-bankers are more worried about institutional risks in banks such as the quality of governance and management; bankers play these risks down.
By region, the responses show concern about regulation and politics to be strongest in Europe and North America. The top concerns in the Asia Pacific region focus more on the macro-economy and the risk of sharp changes in interest rates.
“Although there are encouraging signs in this survey, respondents’ concerns around over regulation need to be taken seriously. It would be ironic if new banking rules ended up snuffing out the recovery,” said David Lascelles, the survey’s editor.
Global Financial Services Risk Leader, Dominic Nixon, PwC, explained, “While some respondents viewed the growth of regulation as necessary, we need to carefully look at the potential unintended costs and consequences it may produce. Onerous regulation could slow profitability and innovation- during a time when the banks’ contribution to the global economic recovery is most needed.”
Press Release and Documents
Abby Yung-United Statesyung.email@example.com+44 (0) 20 7212 7777+ 44 (0) 7703 563 624
More from News releases
Subscribe to rss feedXML
Most acquisitions and divestments don’t maximise value – even when some dealmakers think they do. But acquirers who prioritise value creation at the onset outperform peers by as much as 14%
Traditional cost-cutting measures aren’t enough to solve current profitability crisis in Financial Services industry
CEO confidence in growth dips dramatically